Consultation on Retailer Reliability Obligation Detailed Design Issues

Publication date: Wednesday, 05th December 2018.

Following the COAG Energy Council meeting on 26 October 2018, Ministers agreed that the Energy Security Board (ESB) would progress development of draft National Electricity Law amendments to give effect to a Retailer Reliability Obligation (the Obligation).

The ESB consulted on detailed policy issues relating to the Obligation. These included the framework for determining the firmness of contracts used by liable entities to meet their contracting requirements under the Obligation, the materiality of the reliability gap, and the compliance and cost-recovery regime.

The ESB invited comments from interested parties on the issues and questions set out in these papers. This consultation closed on 21 December 2018.

Stakeholder submissions recieved in response to this consulation process are available below, excluding where stakeholders clearly indicated that a submission should remain confidential, either whole or in part.

 

Files

File nameSize
PDF icon Material Reliability Gap Definition and Communication Consultation Paper661.53 KB
PDF icon Compliance - Procurer of Last Resort Cost Recovery Consultation Paper800.22 KB
PDF icon Firmness Principles for Qualifying Contracts Consultation Paper563.28 KB
PDF icon AEC Triple Submission.pdf249.99 KB
PDF icon AGL submission_RRO detailed design elements_final.pdf111.43 KB
PDF icon Aluminium Response to Firmness Principles for Qualifying Contracts.pdf208.59 KB
PDF icon Aurora Energy response to Retailer Reliability Obligation detailed design issues.pdf1.44 MB
PDF icon BlueScope Response to Detailed Design Issues.pdf124.96 KB
PDF icon EEQ Response to Retailer Reliability Obligation Submission.pdf62.2 KB
PDF icon ERM Power Response to Compliance-Procurer of Last Resort Cost Recovery Consultation Paper.pdf159.92 KB
PDF icon ERM Power Response to Firmness Principles for Qualifying Contracts Consultation Paper.pdf162.35 KB
PDF icon ERM Power Response to Material Reliability Gap Definition and Communication Consultation Paper.pdf170.16 KB
PDF icon Hydro Tasmania Response to Material Reliability Gap Definition and Communication Consultation Paper.pdf586.75 KB
PDF icon Origin submission on RRO consultation papers.pdf216.28 KB
PDF icon Rio Tinto Response to ESB consultations on Reliability Obligation Rule design.pdf264.76 KB
PDF icon Snowy Hydro Material Reliability Gap Definition and Communication.pdf308.51 KB
PDF icon Snowy Hydro Firmness Principles for Qualifying Contracts (3).pdf274.94 KB
PDF icon Stanwell response to firmness principles for qualifying contracts.pdf1.63 MB
PDF icon Stanwell response to material reliability gap.pdf1.92 MB
PDF icon Stanwell response to procurer of last resort cost recovery paper.pdf2.32 MB
PDF icon TransGrid Response to firmness principles for qualifying contracts.pdf249.54 KB